06-21-2006, 02:35 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 62
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Version 1.1 -> 1.11 ??
Okay I'll probably get flamed for this but here goes... why is the this version 1.11 and not 1.1.1 (as in the first 1.1 bug fix) or 1.2 (as the next release in the 1.x tree)?
Since versions are not related to decimal numbers (cvs, for example) I don't understand the logic behind it. (one-dot-one => one-dot-eleven ???)
This is not a criticism, simply a request for clarification as I am curious.
BTW, Nice job to all that put together the PC-BSD distro!
Krreagan
|
|
06-21-2006, 02:43 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 804
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
|
......
There is no logic with version numbering in the open source community, and nove should say the contrary ! :x
|
|
06-21-2006, 02:54 PM
|
 |
Super Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Estonia
Posts: 3,610
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Version 1.1 -> 1.11 ??
|
Originally Posted by krreagan
|
|
Okay I'll probably get flamed for this but here goes... why is the this version 1.11 and not 1.1.1 (as in the first 1.1 bug fix) or 1.2 (as the next release in the 1.x tree)?
|
Consider it like version 1 with 11th patch.
__________________
"All parts should go together without forcing. Therefore, if you can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not use a hammer." -- IBM maintenance manual, 1975
|
|
06-21-2006, 04:47 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 3,710
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Or the second dot got lost somewhere on the Internet 
|
|
06-21-2006, 04:51 PM
|
|
Super Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Estonia
Posts: 3,610
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
|
Originally Posted by Charles
|
|
Or the second dot got lost somewhere on the Internet
|
CRC ERROR!
__________________
"All parts should go together without forcing. Therefore, if you can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not use a hammer." -- IBM maintenance manual, 1975
|
|
06-21-2006, 06:36 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Ga. USofA
Posts: 7,906
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Hhahahahha.
Just curious does PCBSD put any sense into version numbers? To some people the roadmap for PCBSD1.4 looks like it should be PCBSD 1.0 XD
I'm familer enough with FreeBSD, Linux Kernel, and Debian versioning but PCBSD just seems to up the anty when they patch
|
|
06-21-2006, 07:20 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 804
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
|
Originally Posted by TerryP
|
Hhahahahha.
Just curious does PCBSD put any sense into version numbers? To some people the roadmap for PCBSD1.4 looks like it should be PCBSD 1.0 XD
I'm familer enough with FreeBSD, Linux Kernel, and Debian versioning but PCBSD just seems to up the anty when they patch
|
:lol:
:lol:
:lol:
|
|
06-29-2006, 02:56 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 62
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
|
Originally Posted by Charles
|
|
Or the second dot got lost somewhere on the Internet
|
You don't suppose that's where all my single socks go?
Krreagan
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:29 AM.
|
|
