|
Originally Posted by Charles
|
That looks cool...
I had a look at their home page and its features... What features does it have that KMPlayer doesn't?
|
It's not exactly features I'm reffering to, it's more the way the application is put together. For example, if you go to File --> Open, the way you open new files are weird, and iratating to use IMHO, with KPlayer, when you pick File --> Open you get a regular KDE file dialog and select the file you want and off you go. Also the last time I tried KMPlayer, whenever I double clicked a video file it would open a new session of KMPlayer, which really annoyed me because I couldn't have one video playing and double click another in Konqueror and the current video would be stopped and the double clicked one automatically started, which was kind of a pain in the butt. I've adjusted KPlayer to it only has the File, View, Player, Playlist... toolbar, so it's very simple to look at. For example , back when I was still using Windows, I preffered the old stripped down Windows Media Player 6 (Or even better then open source Media Player Classic imitation of it) instead of the clunky and bloated newer versions which took forever to start up and had ads and crap.
Charles by the way, in PC-BSD how come the KDE programs have a seperate menu section in the KMenu? Isn't that a little confusing to users?
|
Originally Posted by Charles
|
|
I think we could remove Noatun and have Amarok and KMPlayer + the codecs instead...
|
I think that's a great idea, amaroK is a brilliant music player, and then if we have a very simple video player that's not acting weird, like Noatun sometimes are, then I think PC-BSD would be a good platform for multimedia (We just need a PBI for libdvdcss and w32codecs and all that stuff hosted over here in europe and let it be widely know: "Hey you can download the codecs from overseas and then you're in business" :P ).